Интересно,
17 May 2010 23:49![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
ahilaesа когда помрет Кононов, российский президент тоже наградит его, как Арнольда Мери, посмертным орденом, а российский посол в Латвии будет возлагать на его могиле венки?
ahilaesahilaes
Profile
Подколодный
Page Summary
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
Style Credit
- Style: Neutral Good for Practicality by timeasmymeasure
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 17 May 2010 20:53 (UTC)Ничего особливого он собственно не сделал, все стороны в войну мочили своих противников достаточно брутально.
no subject
Date: 17 May 2010 21:32 (UTC)no subject
Date: 17 May 2010 20:57 (UTC)no subject
Date: 17 May 2010 21:18 (UTC)no subject
no subject
Date: 17 May 2010 21:42 (UTC)По Кононова будет решено забыть, скорее всего. А Мери станут раскручивать пуще
Брежневапрежнего.no subject
Date: 18 May 2010 06:43 (UTC)Очень интересное судебное решение. И мнения есть всякие.
ROZAKIS, TULKENS, SPIELMANN AND JEBENS:
We believe that the answer given by the Court to this particular claim is not the correct one. The mere silence of international law does not suffice to prove that the consent and the intentions of the international community in 1944 were clear as far as the imprescriptibility of war crimes was concerned, particularly if one takes into account that before Nuremberg and Tokyo, the state of international criminal law concerning individual responsibility for war crimes had not yet attained a degree of sophistication and completeness permitting the conclusion that the technical and procedural issues as to the application of that law had been unequivocally determined. Basically, one could say that up to 1944 general international law – as a combination of existing general international agreements and State practice – had resolved the issue of individual responsibility (and not only State responsibility), and that only the post-war period fine-tuned procedural issues, such as the question of the statute of limitations for war crimes.
no subject
Date: 18 May 2010 07:18 (UTC)Но тут и мнений никаких не нужно.
Если Колеровы-Слуцкие-Лавровы начинают вопить и дергаться, "значит, хорошие сапоги, надо брать".
no subject
Date: 18 May 2010 07:21 (UTC)no subject
Date: 18 May 2010 05:15 (UTC)В случае с Кононовым также вполне возможно. Ибо уже символ.
no subject
Date: 18 May 2010 07:20 (UTC)Интересно, не знал, спасибо.
>В случае с Кононовым также вполне возможно. Ибо уже символ.
Символ чего?
no subject
Date: 21 May 2010 15:36 (UTC)кремлизма